|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==MindMa7h==
| |
| A polar sphere can be defined with
| |
| *radius
| |
| *angle x
| |
| *angle y
| |
|
| |
|
| This results in a double cover etc.
| |
| Buuuuut... the cool thing of course is in algebra, its (not)counting. But its algebra. thats cool enough anyway ;)
| |
|
| |
| ==So:==
| |
|
| |
| *IF notrivial => 1(c(a)+(b)) <= this ismt wrong
| |
| *THEN you get two interpretations that inherently reduce by euler etc. see above. its an elegant circular argument, blabla etc.
| |
| *So, according to the universe, probably as to our limited understanding of that space, there is a reason for
| |
| 1. zero, plus & minus & infinite geometries
| |
| 2. because any complete path on unity sphere is global and without inversion no reduction. plots in 3d as a quaternion(path)
| |
|
| |
| QED?
| |